Taxis For All Campaign
Skip NavigationNAVIGATION

 

Previous Posts

Albany MTA deal would hike taxi fare 50 cents

England: Accessibility slammed on public transport...

San Francisco: Hybrid cabs working

The hybrid cab story...without accessibility

The new VPG website

NY Times: Cabbies head to Albany to object to $1 s...

Kingston, Ontario: No accessible cabs, so paratran...

Las Vegas most accessible U.S. city, says editor

Melbourne, Australia paper: Tram accessibility due...

Senate taxi surcharge questioned


Taxis For All Campaign News Blog

Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Credit card readers, back-seat TVs, GPS devices -- the Taxi & Limousine Commission is enamored with technological gimmicks that do little to improve taxi riding and nothing to improve access. Now it is looking to expand on these earlier proposals and has put out an RFP asking for ideas. It's open to the public. Should the Taxis For All Campaign reply?

Here's a blog entry from CNET about the TLC plan.


Here's the request for information (RFI). Submissions are due on June 15.

See current comments on this story by hitting "post your comments" link, below.

Labels: , ,

posted by Webmaster 2 at
  email this post  
 
 

1 Comments:

Anonymous Linda Ostreicher said...

I wonder why the TLC doesn't include assistive technology in its RFI. There is no mention of making the existing passenger experience better for blind, low-vision, hard of hearing, or deaf passengers.

Instead of having entertainment and ads in multiple languages, how about including a telephone or screen-based translation service for communicating with the driver? This could include sign language for the deaf.

Then there are all the would-be passengers who can't even get in conventional taxicabs--more accessible vehicles would certainly enhance their experience.

Instead it seems the TLC is determined to pursue high-tech for the sake of high-tech. And to bombard us with ever more advertising.

Thursday, May 7, 2009 at 5:01:00 PM EDT | Permalink  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home